Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Essay - 1239 Words

As surely as the possibility of God’s existence is self-evident to mankind, so it seems is the possibility of His non-existence. While virtually every culture throughout history has believed in at least one deity, the arguments for and against the existence of Christianity’s God have raged on for centuries. In his Institutes, John Calvin argued that God planted the knowledge of His existence in the heart of every man, saying: That there exists in the human mind, and indeed by natural instinct, some sense of Deity, we hold to be beyond dispute, since God himself, to prevent any man from pretending ignorance, has endued all men with some idea of his Godhead, the memory of which he constantly renews and occasionally enlarges, that all to a†¦show more content†¦To begin with, a brief summary of Anselm’s ontological argument is appropriate. First, Anselm describes God as, â€Å"something than which we can conceive of nothing greater.† He then proceeds to ascribe two important features to the fool: (a) He understands the claim (or, the definition) that God is something than which we can conceive of nothing greater. (b) He does not believe that God exists. Anselm believes that this combination is contradictory and that, surely, anyone who understands who God is purported to be can also be convinced that God does exist in fact exist. From the fool’s perspective, God exists in his understanding (a) but not in reality (b). This, then, is the crux of Anselm’s argument: to prove to the fool that God cannot possibly exist in the understanding realm alone. Anselm’s argument seems to follow this course: (1) The fool believes that God exists in understanding alone. (2) By Anselm’s definition, God is a being than which none greater can be conceived. (3) But it is greater for a thing to exist in reality than in the realm of understanding alone. (4) So, the fool necessarily must believe that a being than which none greater can be conceived exists solelyShow MoreRelatedTheories Of Probable Cause, Reasonable Suspicion, And Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt1432 Words   |  6 Pagescause, reasonable suspicion, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt, by trying to link the topic that this learner selected which was a Juveniles Right to Counsel. If this learners topic does not have relate to these discussion, and alternate case will be revived to address the topic. But before this learner discusses the sections of this discussion, this learner thinks we can understand what will be discussed if we know the definition of probable cause, reasonable suspicion, and proof beyond a reasonableRead MoreTheories Of Probable Cause, Reasonable Suspicion, And Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt1429 Words   |  6 Pagesprobable cause, reasonable suspicion, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt, by trying to link the topic that this learner selected whi ch was a Juveniles Right to Counsel. If this learner’s topic does not relate to these discussions, an alternate case will be revived to address the topic. But before this learner discusses the sections of this discussion, this learner thinks we can understand what will be discussed if we know the definition of probable cause, reasonable suspicion, and proof beyond a reasonableRead MoreThe Argument For Critical Thinking845 Words   |  4 Pagesa unanimous decision beyond a reasonable doubt. The hero of this movie appears to be Henry Fonda, the first juror to vote not guilty. He kept challenging the evidence by saying isn t it possible?...that the evidence was wrong. Do some critical thinking on this...using a good paragraph answer if isn t it possible? is the same thing as beyond a reasonable doubt. Start with a â€Å"yes† or â€Å"no† and then eleaborate. No, â€Å"isnt it possible† and â€Å"beyond a reasonable† doubt are two different conceptsRead MoreResearch Material on Twelve Angry Men1249 Words   |  5 Pagesand this is the responsibility of the judge presiding in any case. However, the film Twelve Angry Men shows that in the 1950s the judge may fail to fully educate the jury regarding the concept of reasonable doubt. Moreover, even in todays system of justice there is confusion as what reasonable doubt really means and how it should be applied. Introduction When accused of wrongdoing or of a specific crime, American citizens are afforded certain rights thanks to the system of democracy in theRead MoreEssay The Difference Between Civil Law and Criminal Law639 Words   |  3 Pageslarge, not for you personally. In a criminal case, the Crown prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that at the end of a trial the judge or jury can only find the defendant guilty if they are left without a reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt. In other words, there is no logical or rational reason to doubt the defendant’s guilt. This is not the case in civil law. Civil law is about private disputes between individualsRead MoreQuestions On The Highway Traffic Act959 Words   |  4 Pagesperson, therefore the Kanda rule does not apply. There is no possibility of incarceration upon conviction, according to s.214 (1). Therefore, this is an absolute liability offence. The prosecutor must prove identification and actus reus beyond a reasonable doubt. 4. Elements of the offence: Absolute Liability Offence †¢ Operator: identification, operating the vehicle †¢ Vehicle: definition †¢ Shall obey †¢ Instructions or directions indicated on any sign so erected 5. The element: Operator (identification)Read MoreThe Difference Between Private and Public Law Systems in the O.J. Simpson Trial735 Words   |  3 Pagessomeone in the criminal court for the murder, the case against the defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt which means that it should be proven to the extent that there could be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person that the defendant is guilty.   If doubt  does  affect a reasonable persons belief that the defendant is guilty, the jury is not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.   What went wrong in O. J. Simpson case? What has happened in his that led to acquittal? ProbablyRead MoreProbable Cause946 Words   |  4 PagesTillian Stokeling November 10, 2010 Criminal Procedures Mid- Term Probable cause does not rise to the level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt but must be beyond a mere hunch or guess. The legal standard to a probable cause arrest is when an officer finds evidence during a valid stop and frisk search that confirms the reasonable suspicion of an officer that a crime has been or is being committed and would lead to the arrest of and offender. There are a variety of sources to establish probableRead MoreThe Causes Of The Salem Witch Trials1748 Words   |  7 Pagesfamilies begun to take control of the situation themselves. A party of colonist searched all around Salem for possible witches. Many trials then began to occur, and all of these had been unlawful. In result of this many citizens began to publicly doubt the results of the trials. A group of mothers led a public sentiment opposing the proceedings. This, after almost a year of the trials, resulted in the authorities creating retrials without spectral evidence.After many outbreaks and much thought, Read MoreThe Justice System Has Routine Legalities914 Words   |  4 Pagesway, and sending them to jail. Those being accused and under suspicion are still given rights assumed to them by the constitution and defendants are to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable double. First a persons must be arrested and booked before they are to be found guilty in a trial court. Reasonable suspicion and Probable cause are the level of reasoning from the officers that begin the evaluation of a situation that will either determine the level of evidence needed to detain or